Monthly Archives: September 2010

Where’s the Beef? – When You Need It?

*Some people want to know why I criticize the Democrats/Liberals and Obama all the time.  Hey!  It’s not like it’s a mission in life.  I’d rather sit around and read Westerns.  Sadly, though, we have a media that sits in the corner with the Democrats/Liberals and Obama and won’t report the truth.  Not enough Conservative writers are available to the general public, so I add what I can.  And it’s not so much criticizing as it is airing the truth about what is happening and what our representatives are up to.  These guys are transparent all right.  You can see straight through their lies, phony boasts, anti-Americanism, and utter incompetency.  I’m not a loud voice, but I try always to write the truth about what’s happening.  As did Clara Peller, I just want to ask:  ‘Where’s the beef?’

*When the Democrats concoct a bill and name it a ‘reform’ bill, you can be sure it isn’t.  The proof is not in the packaging or labeling, it’s in the action.  Nothing the Dems consider will ever be done if it hurts their own pockets [or those of the special interests they usually rail against or share a bed with—Unions, Muslims, the Liberal media, Government Motors] or goes contrary to picking the pockets of the American citizens.  Once they tax and charge and fee and penalize the populace equal to its entire income, then what?  It seems that’s the only way to stop the Liberals, though they’d still borrow to fund even more ‘reform’—and blame it on the Republicans, is to get rid of them.  Any people out there who vote Democrat deserve the mess, but the rest of us don’t.  Let’s go November!

*According to Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor [as seen through the eyes of leftist?] Michael Posner: “…we have to deal with issues of discrimination or potential discrimination…”  I guess that means that Hispanics [legal and illegal] and blacks will be favored everywhere just because of their race, and the ‘possibility’ of discrimination somewhere or sometime.  Never mind the majority of Americans from Ireland, Italy, Great Britain, France, Germany, Thailand, China, Japan etc.—or even the Indian {American and Asian] populations.  The majority of Americans are the ones being discriminated against these days.  Never mind need, decide things based on race so you can’t be called a racist.  And be sure to kowtow to Muslims in America [who train terrorists, condemn America, and threaten free speech] to show how tolerant you are of the intolerant, misogynistic ‘religion of peace’—the latter being a misnomer if there ever was one.  Like the old joke, it’s a matter of ‘piece’, as in ‘a piece of this and a piece of that’ until even the left is locked out.  How do like them apples, Mr Posner?  Or should we call you an American apologist first and an American citizen second?

* Isn’t there a federal law against willfully damaging an antique in the public trust?

What kind of desk does the President sit behind in the Oval Office?  It’s the Resolute Desk, a gift from Queen Victoria to President Rutherford B Hayes in 1880—that’s 130 years ago folks!  Most Presidents have used it—whether in the Oval Office or their private studies—with the exception of Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Gerald Ford.  I don’t know what they used, but I’m sure it wasn’t orange crates.

HMS Resolution was a British ship of the Edward Belcher expedition looking for the Northwest passage.  It became stuck and was abandoned in the ice—later found near Baffin Bay by the American whaler George Henry—James Buddington commanding.  The US bought her, refitted her, and presented her to Queen Victoria on December 17, 1856 as a symbol of peace.

Years later, when it was broken up, the British Government had at least two desks made from the timbers of the Resolute by the cabinet makers at the Joiner’s Shop of Chatham Dockyard.  In 1880, they sent one—a partner’s desk—to President Rutherford B Hayes as a thank you for rescuing and refitting HMS Resolute and returning it to Great Britain in 1856.

In any case, the Desk is an honored and valuable antique, a National treasure, and some say ‘an icon of the Presidency.’  For the most part, Presidents have treated it and the oval office with the respect due them.  Until President Clinton and the latest fraud that is.  Clinton used the Oval Office for his sexual trysts.  Obama uses it as a lounge.  [He routinely sits back in his chair with shod feet up on top of the desk.]

Can you think of any good reason why a servant of the people should treat American property and tradition as he does?  Not only that, but he trashes the spirit, the sense of honor, the American economy, the American people, and the Constitution with impunity.  He tries to socialize, Islam-a-size, and Communist-a-size the Country while defanging its defense and kowtowing to foreign potentates.  You guys who voted for him should be hung up by your nose hairs.  This President is a disgrace and insult to the American people.

*Felicity Cloake [UK Daily Mail, August 11, 2010] says:  “The UN is considering strategies to cut levels of meat consumption worldwide [and replace the protein with—grubs and bugs?—] as part of its commitment to stamp out famine and cut global warming.”  Sure, shut down the production tasty and acceptable meat, which is a basic protein, and replace the loss with bugs?  Does anyone have any idea how many jobs would be lost?  It’s not like people can be retrained to run ‘bug farms.’  Has anyone tested for bug flatulence lately?  And who will take care of the cattle and horses thus unemployed?  This is simply another inane idea from the leftist UN which still believes in man-made global warming.  Does anyone think the UN officials are going to serve bugs at their state dinners?  They should set an example you know.

*According to on August 16: “A Hamas leader says Muslims ‘have to build’ a mosque near ground zero.”  At last.  Somebody agrees with Obama.  He should be proud.

*As reported by CNS: “Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said that Jesus’s Golden Rule inspired him to vote to confirm Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court” – This is another example of my losing respect and confidence in Lindsay Graham. He is proving to be a dangerous RINO, and he needs to go. Besides, the ‘golden rule’ is not even appropriate for the situation. If he needs a bible quote, how about this one: “Don’t you know that you yourselves are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit lives in you? If anyone destroys God’s temple, God will destroy him; for God’s temple is sacred, and you are that temple. 1 Corinthians 3 v 16-17”  Kagan believes in abortion as a good thing guaranteed by the Constitution [it isn’t—and it isn’t a right in the moral sense either.] She should never have been voted in. What the Country needs is another sane voice in the Supreme Court, not another John Paul Stevens. Since Graham doesn’t understand this, then he should be given the heave-ho!

*USA Today reports:  “…Designed to thwart the reproduction, raising and sale of sick, deformed or otherwise less-than-healthy pets…lemon laws are more and more being used…[in re pets; to help recoup losses]…Because there’s almost nothing worse than investing your emotions in a “perfect” puppy or kitten only to learn that it suffers from a debilitating, life-altering — or even deadly — disease.”  [Sound familiar?]  So you get your money back.  But what happens to the lemon-lawed pets?  Are they destroyed?  Of course.  This is the whole idea.  Perfect or else.  Animal euthanasia is easy entry into the same for people.  Just ask our seniors who are having Medicare cuts and less than reasonable treatment under the new health plan.  Will lemon laws now migrate into the abortion debate?  Will we be suing doctors for delivering less-than-perfect children?  Will we then put them asleep—all as an extension of the spurious ‘right’ of abortion?  You people who support killing babies are going to rue your words, votes, and positions more and more.

*Per the Washington Examiner of May 29:  “Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., blamed the Bush administration for any lack of oversight leading up to the Gulf oil spill.”  Per Fox News on August 13:  “Embattled Rep. Maxine Waters on Friday blamed the Bush administration for her ethics problems.”  Per the Personal Liberty Digest of August 18: “During a 90-minute press conference, Representative Maxine Waters vehemently denied breaking House conflict-of-interest regulations by allegedly helping garner Federal support for a troubled bank that had close ties to her husband.”

Per the Des Moines Register July 26 in re the Obama Stimulus money:  “Goldman Sachs sent $4.3 billion in federal tax money to 32 entities, including many overseas banks, hedge funds and pensions, according to information made public…” Per the Wall Street Journal August 2: “…Obama is attempting to blame the [Bush and the] GOP for the U.S. economy’s current woes…”  Per The Hill on May 25: “Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) on Tuesday said partial blame for the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico lies with the Bush administration.”  Per the Daily Caller on February 6: “…Faced with mounting national opposition to his party’s platform, the President reminded voters the real reason the trillion-dollar stimulus package still hasn’t reduced unemployment to 8 percent as promised: Bush did it, and it’ll take a lot of time to undo it.”

President Bush and his administration have been gone for some 19 months.  At what point do Obama and the Congress [collective or individually] start taking the heat for their own actions in making a bad situation worse, fanning the flames, adding more fuel to the flames.  When the House collapses or burns down, perhaps taking the incompetent Obama with it, will we continue to hear forever the his vocal:  “I didn’t do it with my little burned match sticks!  Bush did it! Bush did it!—echoed by the dead and buried Pelosi and Reid and Frank and Dodd ad infinitum.

*It’s time to tell the World we can’t support them anymore.  All the socialist, communist, and otherwise poorly run countries are going to have to fend for themselves for two or three years.  Anyone asking for help thereafter is going to have to prove the need and the fact that it isn’t going to waste it on banana governments.  We will still be willing to buy goods at fair prices to help those growing countries shed their banana images.


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Political Application Form

Application Form for Candidates for the Offices of Representative, Senator and President of the USA

This test must be completed by the candidate [not a staff member] at one time, at a controlled location, without staff around, and with independent proctors.  Answer the questions without evasion. Time limit is two hours.  The candidate must go through an airport-type full body scan before answering the essay questions.  Appropriate official documents must be included with each test.  The test will be signed at the end to indicate the candidate’s true beliefs are presented within, and he/she will not be permitted crib notes, televisors [ala Obama], or other assistance in answering.  All cell phones will be confiscated for the duration of the exam.  The answers and documents will be reviewed by an independent group.  All answers and copies of documents will be released to the public.

1.    Where were you born?  Under what circumstances?  Who were your grandparents?  Answer in detail.  Did you go to college?  Where and for how long?  Did you graduate?  [submit a transcript and copy of your diploma; submit an official Birth Certificate, and not a certificate of birth that doesn’t mean anything.]

2.    What is your view on abortion?  Do you believe in infant life or death?  Do you blame an innocent child for the circumstances surrounding its conception?  Expand your answer and give details.  How would you respond to the following?:  Abortion is not the murder of a human being.  Abortion is the murder of a human being.  Euthanasia and assisted suicide are viable actions for a modern society.

3.    What is your view on the size and scope of the Federal Government?  Give details.  Do you believe in unlimited taxes on Americans to finance Congressional mandates? How much is enough for a Federal Debt?  Where do you draw the line? How can we best reduce the debt and annual deficit and should we?  How do you view pork and earmarks?  What is the relationship between the States and the Federal Government?

4.    Are you a Socialist or Communist or Liberal or Progressive or Conservative or Libertarian or other term?  Give examples of your political experience that shows what your ideology really is and why you believe in it.  Provide examples of political positions you have held.

5.    What are your qualifications for this office?  Be specific in your giving of details.  What is your prior political or management experience?  How does this qualify you for this new elected office you want?    Do you believe that judicious bribery is needed to complete political ends?  Where would you be comfortable with such an action.

6.     Do you take an oath to protect the Constitution as it is written or as you want it to be?  Please be specific and expand on your answer.  What are your views on Constitutional amendments?

7.    Do you support all parts of the Constitution—including the amendments—as written?  What part[s] of the Constitution are you against and not likely to protect?  Please expand your answer and give examples.  For example, the second Amendment to the Constitution reads: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”  How do you understand and support this?

8.    What is your position on welfare?  Will you help rein in the costs?  Will you hold fathers responsible for providing support and not disappearing into the sunset?  Will you deny persons the collecting welfare when they don’t need it?  What is your position on ILLEGAL immigration?  [Don’t confuse it with legal immigration.]  Will you support the necessary protection of our borders and reduce illegal immigration logically?

9.    Do you support our troops in all ways at all times?  [Disregard what their civilian orders are.]  How have you shown your support in the past?  What is your total view on the military?  Please expand your answers with specific examples.

10.    Our founding fathers were religious, and they included God in their writings and documents.  They only guaranteed rights in the Constitution.  They didn’t create them.  Do you support God or Atheism in government? The 1st [read: predominate concern] Amendment to the Constitution reads:  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”  Provide explanations of your beliefs in regard to this Amendment.  How does removing crosses from public places, prohibiting school prayer, or banning the use of the word ‘God’ in political discourse mesh with this 1st Amendment?  How do such actions not run afoul of it?

I _________________________ declare that the above answers are true to my beliefs and ideology and make no excuses for them.  I have not equivocated or evaded any answer, and I have not simply answered them to best serve my purposes in the upcoming election.  And I promise to resign any office I might be in if I ever deviate from this philosophy.

_______________________________________        The signature must be notarized.

Please Note for the Journalists:
The Attitude of candidate when completing the essay questions.
The Length of time taken to complete the essay questions.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized